페이지

Posts List

레이블이 미래사상인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시
레이블이 미래사상인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시

2014년 9월 9일 화요일

- 미디어 스타트업을 만난다 / - 미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트


[미디어 스타트업을 만난다①] 느리지만 깊이 있는 뉴스를 제공한다, 슬로우뉴스
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다②] 폭풍설사? 폭풍섹스? 알아서 불러라, ㅍㅍㅅㅅ
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다③] 한국에 필요한 해외 기사를 소개한다, 뉴스 페퍼민트
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다④] 인포그래픽으로 기록하는 세상, 비주얼다이브
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑤] 스타트업 생태계를 육성하는 ‘마중물’, 벤처스퀘어
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑥] 딱딱한 데이터를 말랑말랑한 뉴스로 가공한다, 뉴스젤리
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑦] 당신에게 중요하고 필요한 기사만 뽑아준다, 지니뉴스
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑧] 정보과잉 시대, 큐레이션 미디어가 왕이다; 테크니들
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑨] ‘만화 덕후’에게 ‘종합선물세트’ 같은 웹진, 에이코믹스
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑩] ‘네이버 뉴스’에 질렸나요? ‘뉴스고로케’로 오세요





느리지만 깊이 있는 뉴스를 제공한다
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다①] 블로거들이 모여 만든 대안언론, 슬로우뉴스
입력 : 2014-03-19  17:29:57   노출 : 2014.03.22  10:49:11
김병철 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   


기술을 아는 기자, 언론을 이해하는 기술자의 등장
[미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트③-1] 개발자, 디자이너, 분석가를 영입하는 언론
입력 : 2014-08-02  20:46:30   노출 : 2014.08.04  10:40:30
김병철, 조수경 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   
“무엇을 다루든지 목표는 저널리즘”
[미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트③-2] 아만다 콕스 뉴욕타임스 그래픽팀 에디터
입력 : 2014-08-02  21:25:33   노출 : 2014.08.03  19:45:49
김병철·조수경 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   
“개발은 스토리를 잘 전달하기 위한 도구”
[미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트③-3] 앨버트 선 뉴욕타임스 소프트웨어 엔지니어
입력 : 2014-08-02  21:26:43   노출 : 2014.08.03  19:46:07
김병철·조수경 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr  


“뉴스가 이렇게 각광 받는 시대가 있었나”
[미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트 ⑤-2] 조쉬 퀴트너 ‘플립보드’ 에디토리얼 디렉터
입력 : 2014-08-15  14:09:48   노출 : 2014.08.16  17:11:03
김병철·조수경 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   




딱딱한 데이터를 말랑말랑한 뉴스로 가공한다, 뉴스젤리
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑥] 데이터 커뮤니케이션 그룹, 뉴스젤리
입력 : 2014-05-24  16:55:34   노출 : 2014.05.24  19:50:21
김병철 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   

‘네이버 뉴스’에 질렸나요? ‘뉴스고로케’로 오세요
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다⑩] 대안언론만 모아보는 ‘뉴스 포털’, 뉴스고로케


‘취준생’을 위한 뉴스 앱은 따로 있다, 뉴스퀘어
[미디어 스타트업을 만난다 ⑪] 주요 이슈를 600자로 요약해서 제공
입력 : 2014-06-20  18:53:50   노출 : 2014.06.20  18:53:50
김병철 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   



=================================================================

“‘디지털 천장’ 깨야 디지털 혁신이 가능하다”
[미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트①] ‘조슈아 벤톤’ 니먼 저널리즘 랩 연구소장
입력 : 2014-07-16  16:07:04   노출 : 2014.07.21  09:01:21
김병철·조수경 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr 


“디지털 시대, 위기가 아니라 기회가 왔다”
[미디어의 미래, 디지털 퍼스트 ⑤-1] ‘소셜 매거진’ 플립보드
입력 : 2014-08-15  14:03:05   노출 : 2014.08.16  17:08:50
김병철·조수경 기자 | kbc@mediatoday.co.kr   




2014년 9월 2일 화요일

“포스트 국민국가 시대의 대학이란? ‘리버럴 아트’는 어떤 모습일까”

“포스트 국민국가 시대의 새 ‘리버럴 아트’는 어떤 모습일까”
일본 석학이 말하는 ‘대학이란 무엇인가’
2014년 06월 02일 (월) 12:22:10김봉억 기자  bong@kyosu.net
 “자본주의가 석권한 이 시대에 대학에서 ‘교양주의’를 부활시켜야 한다고 주장하고 싶지는 않다. 지금 필요한 것은 ‘교양’을 부활시키는 일이 아니라 ‘대학’을 다시 정의하는 일이다.”

대학 설치기준 간소화, 교양교육의 붕괴, 대학원 중점화, 국립대학의 법인화, 저출산에 따른 대입 정원의 과잉과 대학생의 학력저하, 신진 연구자의 불안정한 지위, 세계화와 그로 인한 유학생의 증가.
한국 대학의 이야기가 아니다. 1990년대 이후 일본 대학가의 풍경이다. 한국 대학의 모습과 많이도 닮았다. 이런 급격한 대학환경의 변화는 대학은 어디로 가야 하는지를 묻고 있다.
  
 요시미 순야 도쿄대 부총장 
 
요시미 순야 도쿄대 부총장(57세·사진)이 지난 2011년에 쓴 『대학이란 무엇인가』(글항아리, 2014)가 번역돼 나왔다. 향후 10년 동안 16만 명의 대학 입학정원을 줄여 나가자는 교육부의 ‘대학구조개혁’이 쓰나미처럼 밀려오고 있는 현실에서 미래의 대학을 구상하는 데 참고가 될 만하다.
요시미 부총장은 사회학과 도시론, 미디어론, 문화연구 분야에 천착해 온 세계적인 석학이다. 현재 도쿄대 대학원 정보학환 교수로 있으며, 신문사 이사장, 대학종합교육연구센터장, 교육기획실장, 대학사료실장 등을 겸하고 있다. ‘정보학환(情報學環)’이라는 소속이 낯설다. 이곳은 도쿄대가 법인화되면서 기존에 존재하던 조직을 통폐합하는 과정에서, 정보와 관련된 문과와 이과의 대학원을 통합하며 만들어진 조직이라고 한다. 그가 일본에서 제기하고 있는 대학론을 들어 본다.
요시미 교수는 “최근 수십 년에 걸쳐 일본 사회에서 ‘대학’이 사회적 논의의 대상이 된 것은 분명해 보이지만, 대부분의 경우 ‘대학이란 무엇인가’라는 근본적인 질문은 빠뜨린 채 논의가 진행됐다”라고 일본의 사정을 전했다. 요시미 교수는 지금, 진정 필요한 것은 ‘대학’이라는 개념 자체를 재정의하는 것이라고 말한다.
“자본주의가 석권한 이 시대에 대학에서 ‘교양주의’를 부활시켜야 한다고 주장하고 싶지는 않다. 지금 필요한 것은 ‘교양’을 부활시키는 일이 아니라 ‘대학’을 다시 정의하는 일이다.” 과거와 같은 ‘교양’의 부흥으로 회귀되지 않는 포스트 국민국가 시대의 지적 공간으로서 미래의 대학을 재정의할 필요가 있다는 것이다.
요시미 교수는 이 책에서 대학을 ‘미디어’로 본다. “도서관이나 박물관, 극장, 광장 그리고 도시가 미디어인 것처럼 대학 역시 하나의 미디어다. 미디어로서의 대학은 사람과 사람, 사람과 지식의 만남을 지속적으로 매개한다. 그 매개의 기본 원리는 ‘자유’다. 바로 이 때문에 근대 이후 같은 ‘자유’를 지향하는 미디어로서 출판과 대학은 싫든 좋든 복잡한 길항적 제휴 속에서 관계를 맺어 왔다. 중세에는 도시가 미디어로서의 대학의 기반이었고, 근대에 와서는 출판이 대학 바깥에서 발달했으며, 국민국가 시대에 양자는 통합됐다. 그리고 지금 출판의 세계로부터 인터넷의 세계로 급격한 이행이 이뤄지는 상황에서 미디어로서의 대학의 위상도 급속히 변화하고 있다.”
요시미 교수는 대학을 주어진 교육제도로서 파악하기 전에 지식을 매개하는 집합적 실천이 구조화된 장인 ‘미디어’로 이해한다. 요시미 교수는 “대학을 이렇게 재정의함으로써 대학을 둘러싼 오늘날의 문제점을 타개할 실마리를 파악할 수 있지 않을까. 적어도 이런 시도를 통해 ‘대학’에 대한 질문의 사정거리는 크게 확장되리라 생각한다”라고 밝혔다.
인터넷이 전면화된 미래 사회에서 캠퍼스와 교실, 학년제와 다수의 전공 교원을 갖춘 대학은 살아남을 수 있을까. 요시미 교수는 모든 지식을 인터넷을 통해 순식간에 검색할 수 있으므로 더 이상 대학은 필요 없다는 비관론에 오히려 충분한 주의를 기울여야 할 것이라고 말한다.
요시미 교수의 진단을 더 들어 보자. “대학교수의 강의나 토론의 중요성은 남을 것이다. 그러나 모든 대학교수에게 이를테면 마이클 샌델과 같은 ‘백열’ 강의가 가능한 것은 아니며, 애플사는 이미 세계 유수 대학의 양질의 강의를 ‘아이튠스 유’라는 형식으로 연결해 아이패드와 같은 차세대형 휴대단말기로 제공하고 있다. 이런 움직임이 앞으로 더욱 가속화될 것이라는 점은 확실하다. 구글이나 애플, 페이스북과 같은 새로운 인터넷 지식 시스템을 마주해 대학이라는 상대적으로 낡은 지식 형성의 장이 무엇을 자신의 고유성으로 삼아야 할지를 결정해야 하는 때가 오고 있다.”
그는 오늘날 대학이 처한 어려운 상황의 배후에 있는 가장 큰 역사적 변화는 국민국가의 퇴조를 꼽는다. 대학은 국민국가의 이데올로기 장치에서 글로벌한 관료제적 경영체로 변모하고 있다는 것이다. “이제 대학은 ‘자유로운 이성’을 위해 국가와 긴장관계를 유지하는 것보다는 수월성의 셈법이 지배하는 대학에서 세계의 의미와 가치에 대한 질문이 효력을 상실하고 말았다는 사실에 보다 신경을 써야 한다.”
대학이란 ‘자유’를 향한 의지다. 그러나 그 자유의 조건은 시대와 더불어 변화한다. 오늘날 대학은 이미 자본주의 바깥에 있는 비평가가 아니라 자본의 순환시스템을 담당하는 중요한 요소가 됐다. 이제는 발견이나 개발만이 아니라 관리에도 주력하는 다양한 새로운 전문지식과 새로운 리버럴 아트 사이의 긴장감 있는 관계를 창출해야 한다는 것이 요시미 교수의 생각이다. 포스트 국민국가 시대의 새로운 ‘자유=리버럴’에 형태를 부여하는 것이라고 제안한다.
요시미 교수가 말하는 ‘미래 대학’의 구상이 구체적으로 그려지지는 않는다. 이 책을 번역한 서재길 국민대 교수(국어국문학과)는 ‘옮긴이의 말’에서 조금은 더 구체적인 미래 대학의 상을 보여 주었다. 요시미 교수가 현재 진행 중인 과제는 첫째, 20세기 일본과 아메리카니즘, 둘째 MALUI 제휴와 디지털 지식 기반, 셋째, 20세기 동아시아문화사 쓰기라고 한다. Museum, Archives, Library, University, Industry의 이니셜을 딴 MALUI라는 다소 생소한 용어에서 짐작할 수 있듯, 지금까지 공공적 아카이브를 구축해온 도서관, 박물관, 미술관, 문서관, 자료관, 필름센터, 방송 프로그램 아카이브 등의 기관과 대학, 산업체가 제휴해 새로운 형태의 아카이브를 정비하는 작업을 통해 디지털 사회의 지식 기반을 구축하는 작업을 하고 있다. ‘정보학환’이라는 학제적 연구기관과 MALUI라는 영역 횡단적 네트워크가 요시미 교수가 구상하고 있는 새로운 대학의 모습을 구현하려는 노력이 아닐까라는 것이다.
서 교수는 “대학을 고정불변의 실체로 보려는 어떠한 시도와도 결별하고 있다는 점이 이 책이 지닌 가장 큰 장점이자 매력”이라고 말했다. 서 교수는 이 책을 번역하면서 느낀 점을 이렇게 밝히고 있다. “사실 우리는 우리 사회가 요구하는 고등교육의 모습과 대학상이 어떠한 것인지, 대학은 어느 방향으로 나아가야 할지에 대해 사회적인 합의를 찾기 위한 진지한 논의를 제대로 한 적이 없다. 과거의 대학으로 회수되지도 시장과 자본에 종속되지도 않으면서 사회 구성원의 공공재로서의 대학을 다시 생각해보자는 이 책의 주장은 오늘날 우리 사회에 꼭 필요한 문제제기가 아닌가 한다.”
김봉억 기자 bong@kyosu.net

2014년 8월 13일 수요일

The Information Philosopher

The Information Philosopher
The Freedom section of Information Philosopher is now a book.
Click here for infoClick for information about <i>Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy</i>
What is information? How is it created? Why is it a better tool for examining philosophical problems than traditional logic or linguistic analysis? Has information philosophy actually solved any problems?
What is information?
The simple definition of information is the act of informing - the communication of knowledge from a sender to a receiver that informs (literally shapes) the receiver.A message that is certain to tell you something you already know contains no new information.
If everything that happens was certain to happen, as determinist philosophers claim, no new information would ever enter the universe. Information would be a universal constant. There would be "nothing new under the sun." Every past and future event can in principle be known by a super-intelligence with access to such a fixed totality of information (Laplace's Demon).
The total amount of mass and energy in the universe is a constant. A fundamental law of nature is the conservation of mass and energy.
But information is neither matter nor energy, though it needs matter to be embodied and energy to be communicated. Information can be created and destroyed. It is the modern spirit, the ghost in the machine, the mind in the body. It is the soul, and when we die, it is our information that perishes. The matter remains. Information is a potential objective value, the ultimate sine qua non.
How is information created?
Ex nihilo, nihil fit, said the ancients, Nothing comes from nothing. But information is no (material) thing. Information is physical, but it is not material. Information is aproperty of material. We can create something (immaterial) from nothing!
But we shall find that it takes a special kind of energy (free or available energy, with negative entropy) to do so.Information is not constant. Where matter and energy are conserved quantities in physics, information is not conserved. We know that information is being createdbecause the universe began some thirteen billion years ago in a state of minimal information. The "Big Bang" was formless radiation, pure energy, no material particles. How matter formed into information structures like the galaxies, stars, and planets is the beginning of a story that will end with understanding how human minds emerged to understand our place in the astrophysical universe.
We identify three fundamental processes of information creation - the purely material, the biological, and the mental. The first was the "order out of chaos" when matter formed from radiation and the expansion of the early universe led to the gravitational attraction of randomly distributed matter into highly organized galaxies, stars, and planets. The expansion - the increased space between material objects - drives the universe away from thermodynamic equilibrium (maximum entropy) and creates negative entropy, a quantitative measure of the order that is the basis for all information.
A second kind of information creation was when the first molecule on earth replicated itself and went on to duplicate its information exponentially. Accidental errors in the duplication provided variations in reproductive success. Most important, besides creating information structures, biological systems are alsoinformation processors. They use information to guide their actions.
The third process of information creation, and the most important to philosophy, is human creativity. Almost every philosopher since philosophy began has considered the mind as something distinct from the body. We can now explain that distinction. The mind is the immaterial information in the brain. The brain, part of the material body, is a biological information processor. As some philosophers have speculated, the mind is software in the brain hardware.
The most important information created in a mind is a recording of an individual's experiences (sensations). Recordings are played back (automatically and perhaps mostly unconsciously) as a guide to evaluate future actions (volitions) in similar situations. The particular past experiences reproduced are those stored in the brain located near elements of the current experience.
Sensations are recorded as the mental effects of physical causes.
They are stored as retrievable information in the mind of an individual self. Recordings include not only the five afferent senses but also the internal emotions - feelings of pleasure, pain, hopes, and fears - that accompany the experience.
Volitions are mental causes of physical effects. They begin with 1) reproduction of past experiences that are similar to the current experience as thoughts about possible actions and the (partly random) generation of other alternative possibilities for action. They continue with 2) evaluation of those freely generated thoughts and a willful selection (sometimes habitual) of one of those actions.
Volitions end with 3) the sensations coming back to the mind indicating that the self has caused the action to happen (or not). This feedback is recorded as further retrievable information, reinforcing the knowledge stored in the mind that the individual self can cause this kind of action (or not).
Why is information better than logic and language for solving philosophical problems?
The theory of communication of information is the foundation of our "information age." To understand how we know things is to understand how knowledgerepresents the material world of embodied "information structures" in the mental world of immaterial ideas.All knowledge starts with the recording of experiences. The experiences of thinking, perceiving, knowing, feeling, desiring, deciding, and acting may be bracketed by philosophers as "mental" phenomena, but they are no less real than other "physical" phenomena. They are themselves physical phenomena.
They are just not material things.

All science begins with information gathered from experimental observations, which are mental phenomena. So all knowledge of the physical world rests on the mental. All scientific knowledge is shared information and as such science is immaterial and mental, some might say fundamental. Recall Descartes' argument that the experience of thinking is that which for him is the most certain.
The analysis of language, particularly the analysis of philosophical concepts, which dominated philosophy in the twentieth century, has failed to solve the most ancientphilosophical problems. At best, it claims to "dis-solve" some of them as conceptualpuzzles. The "problem of knowledge" itself, traditionally framed as "justifying true belief," is recast by informaton philosophy as the degree of isomorphism between the information in the physical world and the information in our minds. Psychology can be defined as the study of this isomorphism.
We shall see how information processes in the natural world use arbitrary symbols (e.g., nucleotide sequences) to refer to something, to communicate messages about it, and to give the symbol meaning in the form of instructions for another process to do something (e.g., create a protein). These examples provide support for both theories of meaning as reference and meaning as use.
Note that just as language philosophy is not the philosophy of language, so information philosophy is not the philosophy of information. It is rather the use of information as a tool to study philosophical problems, some of which are today yielding tentative solutions. It is time for philosophy to move beyond logical puzzles and language games.
What problems has information philosophy solved?
Why has philosophy made so little progress? Is it because philosophers prefer problems, while scientists seek solutions? Must a philosophical problem solved become science and leave philosophy? The information philosopher thinks not.But in order to remain philosophy, interested philosophers must themselves examine the proposed information-based solutions and consider them as part of the critical philosophical dialogue.
The full story of cosmic, biological, and mental information creation involves learning some basic physics, particularly quantum mechanics and thermodynamics, along with some information theory. The information philosopher website provides animated visualizations of the most basic concepts that you will need to become an information philosopher.
When you are ready to consider them, among the proposed solutions are:
It turns out that the methodology of information philosophy can be productively applied to some outstanding problems in physics. Philosophers of science might take an interest in the proposed information-based solutions to these problems.
The Fundamental Question of Information Philosophy
Our fundamental philosophical question is cosmological and ultimately metaphysical.
What are the processes that create emergent information structures in the universe?
Given the second law of thermodynamics, which says that any system will over time approach a thermodynamic equilibrium of maximum disorder or entropy, in which all information is lost, and given the best current model for the origin of the universe, which says everything began in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium some 13.75 billion years ago, how can it be that living beings are creating and communicating vast amounts of new information every day?
Why are we not still in that original state of equilibrium?
Broadly speaking, there are four major phenomena or processes that can reduce the entropy locally, while of course increasing it globally to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics. Three of these do it "blindly," the fourth does it with a built-in "purpose," or telos."
  1. Universal Gravitation
  2. Quantum Cooperative Phenomena (e.g., crystallization, the formation of atoms and molecules)
  3. "Dissipative" Chaos (Non-linear Dynamics)
  4. Life
None of these processes can work unless they have a way to get rid of the positive entropy (disorder) and leave behind a pocket of negative entropy (order or information). The positive entropy is either conducted, convected, or radiated away as waste matter and energy, as heat, or as pure radiation. At the quantum level, it is always the result of interactions between matter and radiation (photons). Whenever photons interact with material particles, the outcomes are inherently unpredictable. As Albert Einstein discovered ten years before the founding of quantum mechanics, these interactions involve irreducible ontological chance.
Negative entropy is an abstract thermodynamic concept that describes energy with the ability to do work, to make something happen. This kind of energy is often called free energy or available energy. In a maximally disordered state (called thermodynamic equilibrium) there can be matter in motion, the motion we call heat. But the average properties - density, pressure, temperature - are the same everywhere. Equilibrium is formless. Departures from equilibrium are when the physical situation shows differences from place to place. These differences are information.
The second law of thermodynamics is then simply that isolated systems will eliminate differences from place to place until the various properties are uniform. Natural processes spontaneously destroy information. Consider the classic case of what happens when we open a perfume bottle.
Ludwig Boltzmann derived a mathematical formula for entropy as a summation of the probabilities of finding a system in all the possible states of a system. When every state is equally probable, entropy is at a maximum, and no differences (information) are visible. The formula for negative entropy is just the maximum possible entropy minus the actual entropy(when there are differences from place to place).
Claude Shannon derived the mathematical formula for information and found it to be identical to the formula for negative entropy - a summation of the probabilities of all the possible messages that can be communicated.
Because "negative" entropy (order or information) is such a positive quantity, we chose many years ago to give it a new name - "Ergo," and to call the four phenomena or processes that create it "ergodic," for reasons that will become clear. But today, the positive name "information" is all that we need to do philosophical work.
Answering the Fundamental Question of Information Philosophy
How exactly has the universe escaped from the total disorder of thermodynamic equilibrium and produced a world full of information?
It begins with the expansion of the universe. If the universe had not expanded, it would have remained in the original state of thermodynamic equilibrium. We would not be here.
To visualize the departure from equilibrium that made us possible, remember that equilibrium is when particles are distributed evenly in all possible locations in space, and with their velocities distributed by a normal law - the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution. (The combination of position space and velocity or momentum space is called phase space). When we open the perfume bottle, the molecules now have a much larger phase space to distribute into. There are a much larger number of phase space "cells" in which molecules could be located. It of course takes them time to spread out and come to a new equilibrium state (the Boltzmann "relaxation time.")
When the universe expands, say grows to ten times its volume, it is just like the perfume bottle opening. The matter particles must redistribute themselves to get back to equilibrium. But suppose the universe expansion rate is much faster than the relaxation time. The universe is out of equilibrium, and it will never get back!
In the earliest moments of the universe, material particles were yet stable. Pure radiation energy was in equilibrium at extraordinarily high temperatures. When material particles appeared, they were blasted back into radiation by photon collisions. As the universe expanded, the temperature cooled, the space per photon was increased and the mean free time between photon collisions increased, giving particles a better chance to survive. The expansion red-shifted the photons. The average energy per photon decreased, eventually reducing the number of high energy photons that destroyed the matter. Quarks and electrons became more common. The mean free path of photons was very short. They were being scattered by collisions with electrons.
When temperatures continued to decline, quarks combined into nuclear particles, protons and neutrons. When temperature declined further, to 5000 degrees, about 400,000 years after the "Big Bang," the electrons and protons combined to make hydrogen atoms.
At this time, a major event occurred that we can still see today, the farthest and earliest event visible. When the electrons combined into atoms, the electrons could no longer scatter the photons as easily. The universe became transparent for the photons. Some of those photons are still arriving at the earth today. They are now red-shifted and cooled down to the cosmic microwave background radiation. While this radiation is almost perfectly uniform, it shows very small fluctuations that may be caused by random difference in the local density of the original radiation or even in random quantum fluctuations.
These fluctuations mean that there were slight differences in density of the newly formed hydrogen gas clouds. The force of universal gravitation then worked to pull relatively formless matter into spherically symmetric stars and planets, the original order out of chaos (although this phrase is now most associated with the work on deterministic chaos theory and complexity theory, as we shall see.
How information creation and negative entropy flows appear to violate the second law of thermodynamics
In our open and rapidly expanding universe, the maximum possible entropy (if the particles were "relaxed" into a uniform distribution among the new phase-space cells) is increasing faster than the actual entropy. The difference between maximum possible entropy and the current entropy is called negative entropy. There is an intimate connection between the physical quantity negative entropy and abstract immaterial information, first established by Leo Szilard in 1929.
As pointed out by Harvard cosmologist David Layzer, the Arrow of Time points not only to increasing disorder but also to increasing information.
Two of our "ergodic" phenomena - gravity and quantum cooperative phenomena - pull matter together that was previously separated. Galaxies, stars, and planets form out of inchoate clouds of dust and gas. Gravity binds the matter together. Subatomic particles combine to form atoms. Atoms combine to form molecules. They are held together by quantum mechanics. In all these cases, a new visible information structure appears.
In order for these structures to stay together, the motion (kinetic) energy of their parts must be radiated away. This is why the stars shine. When atoms join to become molecules, they give off photons. The new structure is now in a (negative) bound energy state. It is the radiation that carries away the positive entropy (disorder) needed to balance the new order (information) in the visible structure.
In the cases of chaotic dissipative structures and life, the ergodic phenomena are more complex, but the result is similar, the emergence of visible information. (More commonly it is simply the maintenance of high-information, low-entropy structures.) These cases appear in far-from-equilibrium situations where there is a flow of matter and energy with negative entropy through the information structure. The flow comes in with low entropy but leaves with high entropy. Matter and energy are conserved in the flow, but information in the structure can increase (information is not a conserved quantity).
Information is neither matter nor energy, though it uses matter when it is embodied and energy when it is communicated. Information is immaterial.
This vision of life as a visible form through which matter and energy flow was first seen byLudwig van Bertlanffy in 1939, though it was made more famous by Erwin Schrödinger's landmark essay What Is Life? in 1945, where he claimed that "life feeds on negative entropy."
Both Bertalanffy and Schrödinger knew that the source of negative entropy was our Sun. Neither knew that the ultimate cosmological source of negative entropy is the expansion of the universe, which allowed ergodic gravitation forces to form the Sun. Note the positive entropy leaving the Sun becomes diluted as it expands, creating a difference between its energy temperature and energy density. This difference is information (negative entropy) that planet Earth uses to generate and maintain biological life.
Note that the 273K (the average earth temperature) photons are dissipated into the dark night sky, on their way to the cosmic microwave background. The Sun-Earth-night sky is a heat engine, with a hot energy source and cold energy sink, that converts the temperature difference not into mechanical energy (work) but into biological energy (life).

When information is embodied in a physical structure, two physical processes must occur.
Our first process is whatJohn von Neumanndescribed as
irreversible Process 1.
The first process is the collapse of a quantum-mechanical wave function into one of the possible states in a superposition of states, which happens in any measurement process. A measurement produces one or more bits of information. Such quantum events involve irreducible indeterminacy and chance, but less often noted is the fact that quantum physics is directly responsible for the extraordinary temporal stability and adequate determinism of most information structures.
We can call the transfer of positive entropy, which stabilizes the new information from Process 1, Process 1b.
The second process is a local decrease in the entropy (which appearsto violate the second law of thermodynamics) corresponding to the increase in information. Entropy greater than the information increase must be transferred away from the new information, ultimately to the night sky and the cosmic background, to satisfy the second law.
Given this new stable information, to the extent that the resulting quantum system can be approximately isolated, the system will deterministically evolve according to von Neumann's Process 2, the unitary time evolution described by the Schrödinger equation.
The first two physical processes (1 and 1b) are parts of the information solution to the "problem of measurement," to which must be added the role of the "observer."
The discovery and elucidation of the first two as steps in the cosmic creation process casts light on some classical problems in philosophy and physics , since it is the same two-step process that creates new biological species and explains the freedom and creativity of the human mind.
The cosmic creation process generates the conditions without which there could be nothing ofvalue in the universe, nothing to be known, and no one to do the knowing. Information itself is the ultimate sine qua non.

The Three Kinds of Information Emergence
Note there are three distinct kinds of emergence:
  1. the order out of chaos when the randomly distributed matter in the early universe first gets organized into information structures.This was not possible before the first atoms formed about 400,000 years after the Big Bang. Information structures like the stars and galaxies did not exist before about 400 million years. As we saw, gravitation was the principal driver creating information structures.
    Nobel prize winner Ilya Prigogine discovered another ergodic process that he described as the "self-organization" of "dissipative structures." He popularized the slogan "order out of chaos" in an important book. Unfortunately, the "self" in self-organization led to some unrealizable hopes in cognitive psychology. There is no self, in the sense of a person or agent, in these physical phenomena.
    Both gravitation and Prigogine's dissipative systems produce a purely physical/material kind of order. The resulting structures contain information. There is a "steady state" flow of information-rich matter and energy through them. But they do not process information. They have no purpose, no "telos."
    Order out of chaos can explain the emergence of downward causation on their atomic and molecular components. But this is a gross kind of downward causal control. Explaining life and mind as "complex adaptive systems" has not been successful. We need to go beyond "chaos and complexity" theories to teleonomic theories.
  2. the order out of order when the material information structures form self-replicatingbiological information structures. These are information processing systems.In his famous essay, "What Is Life?," Erwin Schrödinger noted that life "feeds on negative entropy" (or information). He called this "order out of order."
    This kind of biological processing of information first emerged about 3.5 billion years ago on the earth. It continues today on multiple emergent biological levels, e.g., single-cells, multi-cellular systems, organs, etc., each level creating new information structures and information processing systems not reducible to (caused by) lower levels and exertingdownward causation on the lower levels.
    And this downward causal control is extremely fine, managing the motions and arrangements of individual atoms and molecules.
    Biological systems are cognitive systems, using internal "subjective" knowledge to recognize and interact with their "objective" external environment, communicating meaningful messages to their internal components and to other individuals of their species with a language of arbitrary symbols, taking actions to maintain themselves and to expand their populations by learning from experience.
    With the emergence of life, "purpose" also entered the universe. It is not the pre-existent "teleology" of many idealistic philosophies (the idea of "essence" before "existence"), but it is the "entelechy" of Aristotle, who saw that living things have within them a purpose, an end, a "telos." To distinguish this evolved telos in living systems from teleology, modern biologists use the term "teleonomy."
  3. the pure information out of order when organisms with minds generate, store (in the brain), replicate, utilize, and then externalize some non-biological information, communicating it to other minds and storing it in the environment. Communication can be by hereditary genetic transmission or by an advanced organism capable of learning and then teaching its contemporaries directly by signaling, by speaking, or indirectly by writing and publishing the knowledge for future generations.This kind of information can be highly abstract mind-stuff, pure Platonic ideas, the stock in trade of philosophers. It is neither matter nor energy (though embodied in the material brain), a kind of pure spirit or ghost in the machine. It is a candidate for the immaterial dualist "substance" of René Descartes, though it is probably better thought of as a "property dualism," since information is an immaterial property of all matter.
    The information stored in the mind is not only abstract ideas. It contains a recording of the experiences of the individual. In principle every experience may be recorded, though not all may be reproducible/recallable.
The negative entropy (order, or potential information) generated by the universe expansion is a tiny amount compared to the increase in positive entropy (disorder). Sadly, this is always the case when we try to get "order out of order," as can be seen by studying entropy flows at different levels of emergent phenomena.
In any process, the positive entropy increase is always at least equal to, and generally orders of magnitude larger than, the negative entropy in any created information structures, to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics. The positive entropy is named for Boltzmann, since it was his "H-Theorem" that proved entropy can only increase overall - the second law of thermodynamics. And negative entropy is called Shannon, since his theory of information communication has exactly the same mathematical formula as Boltzmann's famous principle;
S = k log W
where S is the entropy, k is Boltzmann's constant, and W is the probability of the given state of the system.


Material particles are the first information structures to form in the universe.. They are quarks, baryons, and atomic nuclei, which combine with electrons to form atoms and eventually molecules, when the temperature is low enough. These particles are attracted by the force of universal gravitation to form the gigantic information structures of the galaxies, stars, and planets.

Microscopic quantum mechanical particles and huge self-gravitating systems are stable and have extremely long lifetimes, thanks in large part to quantum stability. Stars are another source of radiation, after the original Big Bang cosmic source, which has cooled down to 3 degrees Kelvin (3°K) and shines as the cosmic microwave background radiation.

Our solar radiation has a high color temperature (5000K) and a low energy-content temperature (273K). It is out of equilibrium and it is the source of all the information-generating negative entropy that drives biological evolution on the Earth. Note that the fraction of the light falling on Earth is less than a billionth of that which passes by and is lost in space.
A tiny fraction of the solar energy falling on the earth gets converted into the information structures of plants and animals. Most of it gets converted to heat and is radiated away as waste energy to the night sky.

Every biological structure is a quantum mechanical structure. DNA has maintained its stable information structure over billions of years in the constant presence of chaos and noise.

The stable information content of a human being survives many changes in the material content of the body during a person’s lifetime. Only with death does the mental information (spirit, soul) dissipate - unless it is saved somewhere.
The total mental information in a living human is orders of magnitude less than the information content and information processing rate of the body. But the information structures created by humans outside the body, in the form of external knowledge like this book, and the enormous collection of human artifacts, rival the total biological information content.

The Shannon Principle
In his development of the mathematical theory of the communication of information, Claude Shannon showed that there can be no new information in a message unless there are multiple possible messages. If only one message is possible, there is no information in that message.
We can simplify this to define the Shannon Principle. No new information can be created in the universe unless there are multiple possibilities, only one of which can become actual.
An alternative statement of the Shannon principle is that in a deterministic system, information is conserved, unchanging with time. Classical mechanics is a conservative system that conserves not only energy and momentum but also conserves the total information. Information is a "constant of the motion" in a determinist world.
Quantum mechanics, by contrast, is indeterministic. It involves irreducible ontological chance. An isolated quantum system is described by a wave function ψ which evolves according to the unitary time evolution of the linear Schrödinger equation,
i ℏ d | ψ > / dt = H | ψ >.
But isolation is an ideal that can only be approximately realized. Because the Schrödinger equation is linear, a wave function | ψ > can be a linear combination (a superposition) of another set of wave functions | φn >,
| ψ > =  cn | φn >,
where the cn coefficients squared are the probabilities of finding the system in the possible state | φn > as the result of an interaction with another quantum system.
cn2 = < ψ | φn >2.
Quantum mechanics introduces real possibilities, each with a calculable probability of becoming an actuality, as a consequence of one quantum system interacting (for example colliding) with another quantum system.
It is quantum interactions that lead to new information in the universe - both new information structures and information processing systems. But that new information cannot subsist unless a compensating amount of entropy is transferred away from the new information.
And it is only in cases where information persists long enough for a human being to observe it that we can properly describe the observation as a "measurement" and the human being as an "observer." Following von Neumann's "process" terminology, we might complete his admittedly unsuccessful attempt at a theory of the measuring process with the anthropomorphic
Process 3 - a conscious observer recording new information (knowledge) in a human mind.

In less than two decades of the mid-twentieth century, the word information was transformed from a synonym for knowledge into a mathematical, physical, and biological quantity that can be measured and studied scientifically.
In 1929, Leo Szilard connected an increase in thermodynamic (Boltzmann) entropy with any increase in information that results from a measurement, solving the problem of "Maxwell's Demon," a thought experiment suggested by James Clerk Maxwell, in which a local reduction in entropy is possible when an intelligent being interacts with a thermodynamic system.
In the early 1940s, digital computers were invented, by Alan Turing, Claude ShannonJohn von Neumann, and others, that could run a stored program to manipulate stored data.
Then in the late 1940s, the problem of communicating digital data signals in the presence ofnoise was first explored by Shannon, who developed the modern mathematical theory of the communication of information. Norbert Wiener wrote in his 1948 book Cybernetics that "information is the negative of the quantity usually defined as entropy," and in 1949 Leon Brillouin coined the term "negentropy."
Finally, in the early 1950s, inheritable characteristics were shown by Francis Crick, James Watson, and George Gamow to be transmitted from generation to generation in a digital code.

Information is Immaterial
Information is neither matter nor energy, but it needs matter for its embodiment and energy for its communication.
A living being is a form through which passes a flow of matter and energy (with low entropy). Genetic information is used to build the information-rich matter into an information-processing structure that contains a very large number of hierarchically organized information structures.
All biological systems are cognitive, using their internal information structure to guide their actions. Even some of the simplest organisms can learn from experience. The most primitive minds are experience recorders and reproducers.
In humans, the information-processing structures create new actionable information (knowledge) by consciously and unconsciously reworking the experiences stored in the mind.
Emergent higher levels exert downward causation on the contents of the lower levels, ultimately supporting mental causation and free will.
When a ribosome assembles 330 amino acids in four symmetric polypeptide chains (globins), each globin traps an iron atom in a heme group at the center to form the hemoglobin protein. This is downward causal control of the amino acids, the heme groups, and the iron atoms by the ribosome. The ribosome is an example of Erwin Schrödinger's emergent "order out of order," life "feeding on the negative entropy" of digested food.
Notice the absurdity of the idea that the random motions of the transfer RNA molecules (green in the video at right), each holding a single amino acid (red), are carrying pre-determined information of where they belong in the protein being built.
Determinism is an emergent property and an ideal philosophical concept, unrealizable except approximately in the kind of adequate determinism that we experience in the macroscopic world, where the determining information is part of the higher-level control system.
The total information in multi-cellular living beings can develop to be many orders of magnitude more than the information present in the original cell. The creation of this new information would be impossible for a deterministic universe, in which information is constant.
Immaterial information is perhaps as close as a physical or biological scientist can get to the idea of a soul or spirit that departs the body at death. When a living being dies, it is the maintenance of biological information that ceases. The matter remains.
Biological systems are different from purely physical systems primarily because they create, store, and communicate information. Living things store information in a memory of the past that they use to shape their future. Fundamental physical objects like atoms have no history.
And when human beings export some of their personal information to make it a part of human culture, that information moves closer to becoming immortal.
Human beings differ from other animals in their extraordinary ability to communicate information and store it in external artifacts. In the last decade the amount of external information per person may have grown to exceed an individual's purely biological information.
Since the 1950's, the science of human behavior has changed dramatically from a "black box" model of a mind that started out as a "blank slate" conditioned by environmental stimuli. Today's mind model contains many "functions" implemented with stored programs, all of them information structures in the brain. The new "computational model" of cognitive science likens the brain to a computer, with some programs and data inherited and others developed as appropriate reactions to experience.

The Experience Recorder and Reproducer
The brain should be regarded less as an algorithmic computer with one or more central processing units than as a multi-channel and multi-track experience recorder and reproducerwith an extremely high data rate. Information about an experience - the sights, sounds, smells, touch, and taste - is recorded along with the emotions - feelings of pleasure, pain, hopes, and fears - that accompany the experience. When confronted with similar experiences later, the brain can reproduce information about the original experience (an instant replay) that helps to guide current actions.
Information is constant in a deterministic universe. There is "nothing new under the sun." Thecreation of new information is not possible without the random chance and uncertainty of quantum mechanics, plus the extraordinary temporal stability of quantum mechanical structures.
It is of the deepest philosophical significance that information is based on the mathematics ofprobability. If all outcomes were certain, there would be no "surprises" in the universe. Information would be conserved and a universal constant, as some mathematicians mistakenly believe. Information philosophy requires the ontological uncertainty and probabilistic outcomes of modern quantum physics to produce new information.
But at the same time, without the extraordinary stability of quantized information structures over cosmological time scales, life and the universe we know would not be possible. Quantum mechanics reveals the architecture of the universe to be discrete rather than continuous, to bedigital rather than analog.
Moreover, the "correspondence principle" of quantum mechanics and the "law of large numbers" of statistics ensures that macroscopic objects can normally average out microscopic uncertainties and probabilities to provide the "adequate determinism" that shows up in all our "Laws of Nature."
Information philosophy explores some classical problems in philosophy with deeper and more fundamental insights than is possible with the logic and language approach of modern analytic philosophy.
By exploring the origins of structure in the universe, information philosophy transcendshumanity and even life itself, though it is not a mystical metaphysical transcendence.
Information philosophy uncovers the providential creative process working in the universe
to which we owe our existence, and therefore perhaps our reverence.
It locates the fundamental source of all values not in humanity ("man the measure"), not in bioethics ("life the ultimate good"), but in the origin and evolution of the cosmos.
Information philosophy is an idealistic philosophy, a process philosophy, and a systematic philosophy, the first in many decades. It provides important new insights into the Kantian transcendental problems of epistemologyethicsfreedom of the willgod, and immortality, as well as the mind-body problemconsciousness, and the problem of evil.
In physics, information philosophy provides new insights into the problem of measurement, the paradox of Schrödinger's Cat, the two paradoxes of microscopic reversibility and macroscopic recurrence that Josef Loschmidt and Ernst Zermelo used to criticize Ludwig Boltzmann's explanation of the entropy increase required by the second law of thermodynamics, and finally information provides a better understanding of the entanglement and nonlocality phenomena that are the basis for modern quantum cryptography and quantum computing.

Information Philosophers, as do all who would make an advance in knowledge, stand on the shoulders of giant philosophers and scientists of the past and present as we try to make modest advances in the great philosophical problems of knowledgevalue, and freedom.In the left-hand column of all pages are links to nearly three hundred philosophers and scientists who have made contributions to these great problems. Their web pages include the original contributions of each thinker, with examples of their thought, usually in their own words, and where possible in their original languages as well.

Traditional philosophy is a story about discovery of timeless truths, laws of nature, a block universe in which the future is a logical extension of the past, a primal moment of creation that starts a causal chain in which everything can be foreknown by an omniscient being. Traditional philosophy seeks knowledge in logical reasoning with clear and unchanging concepts.Its guiding lights are thinkers like Parmenides, Plato, and Kant, who sought unity and identity, being and universals.
In traditional philosophy, the total amount of information in the conceptually closed universe is static, a physical constant of nature. The laws of nature allow no exceptions, they are perfectly causal. Everything that happens is said to have a physical cause. This is called "causal closure".   Chance and change - in a deep philosophical sense - are said to be illusions.
Information philosophy, by contrast, is a story about invention, about novelty, about biologicalemergence and new beginnings unseen and unseeable beforehand, a past that is fixed but an ambiguous future that can be shaped by teleonomic changes in the present.
Its model thinkers are Heraclitus, Protagoras, Aristotle, and Hegel, for whom time, place, and particular situations mattered.
Information philosophy is built on probabilistic laws of nature. The fundamental challenge for information philosophy is to explain the emergence of stable information structures from primordial and ever-present chaos, to account for the phenomenal success of deterministic laws when the material substrate of the universe is irreducibly chaotic, noisy, and random, and to understand the concepts of truth, necessity, and certainty in a universe of chance, contingency, and indeterminacy.
Determinism and the exceptionless causal and deterministic laws of classical physics are the real illusions. Determinism is information-preserving. In an ideal deterministic Laplacianuniverse, the present state of the universe is implicitly contained in its earliest moments.
This ideal determinism does not exist. The "adequate determinism" behind the laws of natureemerged from the early years of the universe when there was only indeterministic chaos.
In a random noisy environment, how can anything be regular and appear determined? It is because the macroscopic consequences of the law of large numbers average out microscopic quantum fluctuations to provide us with a very adequate determinism.
Information Philosophy is an account of continuous information creation, a story about the origin and evolution of the universe, of life, and of intelligence from an original quantal chaos that is still present in the microcosmos. More than anything else, it is the creation and maintenance of stable information structures that distinguishes biology from physics and chemistry.
Living things maintain information in a memory of the past that they can use to shape the future. Some get it via heredity. Some learn it from experience. Others invent it!
Information Philosophy is a story about knowledge and ignorance, about good and evil, aboutfreedom and determinism.

There is a great battle going on - between originary chaos and emergent cosmos. The struggle is between destructive chaotic processes that drive a microscopic underworld of random eventsversus constructive cosmic processes that create information structures with extraordinary emergent properties that include adequately determined scientific laws -
despite, and in many cases making use of, the microscopic chaos.
Created information structures range from galaxies, stars, and planets, to molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles. They are the structures of terrestrial life from viruses and bacteria to sentient and intelligent beings. And they are the constructed ideal world of thought, of intellect, of spirit, including the laws of nature, in which we humans play a role as co-creator.
Based on insights into these cosmic creation processes, the Information Philosopher proposes three primary ideas that are new approaches to perennial problems in philosophy. They are likely to change some well-established philosophical positions. Even more important, they may reconcile idealism and materialism and provide a new view of how humanity fits into the universe.

The three ideas are
  • An explanation or epistemological model of knowledge formation and communication. Knowledge and information are neither matter nor energy, but they require matter for expression and energy for communication. They seem to be metaphysical.
    Briefly, we identify knowledge with actionable information in the brain-mind. We justify knowledge by behavioral studies that demonstrate the existence of information structures implementing functions in the brain. And we verifyknowledge scientifically.
  • A basis for objective value beyond humanism and bioethics, grounded in the fundamental information creation processes behind the structure and evolution of the universe and the emergence of life.
    Briefly, we find positive value (or good) in information structures. We see negative value (or evil) in disorder and entropy tearing down such structures. We call energy with low entropy "Ergo" and call anti-entropic processes "ergodic."
    Our first categorical imperative is then "act in such a way as to create, maintain, and preserve information as much as possible against destructive entropic processes."Our second ethical imperative is "share knowledge/information to the maximum extent." Like love, our own information is not diminished when we share it with others
    Our third moral imperative is "educate (share the knowledge of what is right) rather than punish." Knowledge is virtue. Punishment wastes human capital and provokes revenge.
  • Watch a 10-minute animated tutorial on theTwo-Stage Solution to
    the Free Will Problem
    scientific model for free will and creativity informed by the complementary roles of microscopic randomness and adequate macroscopic determinism in a temporal sequence that generatesinformation.
    Briefly, we separate "free" and "will" in a two-stage process - first the free generation of alternative possibilities for action, then anadequately determined decision by the will. We call this two-stage view ourCogito model and trace the idea of a two-stage model in the work of a dozen thinkers back to William James in 1884.This model is a synthesis of adequate determinism and limited indeterminism, a coherent and complete compatibilism that reconciles
    free will with both determinism and indeterminism.
    David Hume reconciled freedom with determinism. We reconcile free will with indeterminism.
    Because it makes free will compatible with both a form of determinism (reallydetermination) and with an indeterminism that is limited and controlled by the mind, the leading libertarian philosopher Bob Kane suggested we call this model "Comprehensive Compatibilism."
    The problem of free will cannot be solved by logic, language, or even by physics. Man is not a machine and the mind is not a computer.
    Free will is a biophysical information problem.
All three ideas depend on understanding modern cosmology, physics, biology, and neuroscience, but especially the intimate connection between quantum mechanics and the second law of thermodynamics that allows for the creation of new information structures.
All three are based on the theory of information, which alone can establish the existential status of ideas, not just the ideas of knowledge, value, and freedom, but other-worldly speculations in natural religion like God and immortality.
All three have been anticipated by earlier thinkers, but can now be defended on strong empirical grounds. Our goal is less to innovate than to reach the best possible consensus among philosophers living and dead, an intersubjective agreement between philosophers that is the surest sign of a knowledge advance in natural science.
This Information Philosopher website aims to be an open resource for the best thinking ofphilosophers and scientists on these three key ideas and a number of lesser ideas that remain challenging problems in philosophy - on which information philosophy can shed some light.
Among these are the mind-body problem (the mind can be seen as the realm of information in its free thoughts, the body an adequately determined biological system creating and maintaining information); the common sense intuition of a cosmic creative process often anthropomorphized as a God or divine Providence; the problem of evil (chaotic entropic forces are the devil incarnate); and the "hard problem" of consciousness (agents responding to their environment, and originating new causal chains, based on information processing).
Philosophy is the love of knowledge or wisdom. Information philosophy (I-Phi or ΙΦ) quantifies knowledge as actionable information.
What is information that merits its use as the foundation of a new method of inquiry?
Abstract information is neither matter nor energy, yet it needs matter for its concrete embodiment and energy for its communication. Information is the modern spirit, the ghost in the machine. It is the stuff of thought, the immaterial substance of philosophy.
Over 100 years ago, Bertrand Russell, with the help of G. E. MooreAlfred North Whitehead, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, proposed logic and language as the proper foundational basis, not only of philosophy, but also of mathematics and science. Their logical positivism and the variation called logical empiricism developed by Rudolf Carnap and the Vienna Circle have proved to be failures in grounding philosophy, mathematics, or science.
Information is a powerful diagnostic tool. It is a better abstract basis for philosophy, and for science as well, especially physics, biology, and neuroscience. It is capable of answering questions about metaphysics (the ontology of things themselves), epistemology (the existential status of ideas and how we know them), and idealism itself.
Information philosophy is not a solution to specific problems in philosophy. I-Phi is a new philosophical method, capable of solving multiple problems in both philosophy and physics.
It needs young practitioners, presently tackling some problem, who might investigate that problem using this new methodology. Note that, just as the philosophy of language is not linguistic philosophy, I-Phi is not the philosophy of information, which is mostly about computers and cognitive science.
The language philosophers of the twentieth century thought that they could solve (or at leastdissolve) the classical problems of philosophy. They did not succeed. Information philosophy, by comparison, now has cast a great deal of light on some of those problems. It needs more information philosophers to make more progress.


To recap, when information is stored in any structure, two fundamental physical processes occur. First is a "collapse" of a quantum mechanical wave function, reducing multiple possibilities to a single actuality. Second is a local decrease in the entropy corresponding to the increase in information. Entropy greater than that must be transferred away from the new information structure to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics.
These quantum level processes are susceptible to noise. Information stored may have errors. When information is retrieved, it is again susceptible to noise. This may garble the information content. In information science, noise is generally the enemy of information. But some noise is the friend of freedom, since it is the source of novelty, of creativity and invention, and of variation in the biological gene pool.
Biological systems have maintained and increased their invariant information content over billions of generations, coming as close to immortality as living things can. Philosophers and scientists have increased our knowledge of the external world, despite logical, mathematical, and physical uncertainty. They have created and externalized information (knowledge) that can in principle become immortal. Both life and mind create information in the face of noise. Both do it with sophisticated error detection and correction schemes. The scheme we use to correct human knowledge is science, a two-stage combination of freely invented theories andadequately determined experiments. Information philosophy follows that example.

If you have read this far, you probably already know that the Information Philosopher website is an exercise in information sharing. It has seven parts, each with multiple chapters. Navigation at the bottom of each page will take you to the next or previous part or chapter.Teacher and Scholar links display additional material on some pages, and reveal hidden footnotes on some pages. The footnotes themselves are in the Scholar section.
Our goal is for the website to contain all the great philosophical discussions of our three main ideas, plus preliminary solutions for several classic problems in philosophy and physics, with primary source materials (in the original languages) where possible.
Philosophers who would like to develop their expertise in information philosophy should inquire into support possibilities by writing Bob Doyle, the founder of information philosophy.
Support options include online training sessions by Skype or Google Hangouts, perhaps published to YouTube.
Preferences will be given to current graduate students in philosophy or science - physics, biology, psychology, especially - and current post-docs.
All original content on Information Philosopher is available for your use, without requesting
permission, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.     cc by
Copyrights for all excerpted and quoted works remain with their authors and publishers.